Welcome to Small Business Labs

Emergent Research

  • EMERGENT RESEARCH is focused on better understanding the small business sector of the US and global economy.

    Featured in Alltop

Authors

  • The authors of Small Business Labs are Steve King, Carolyn Ockels and Anthony Townsend. Steve and Carolyn are partners at Emergent Research and research affiliates at the Institute for the Future. Anthony is a Research Director at the Institute for the Future. Steve, Carolyn and Anthony are co-authors of the Intuit Future of Small Business report series.

Disclosure Policy

  • Emergent Research works with corporate, government and non-profit clients. When we reference organizations that have provided us funding in the last year we will note it. If we mention a product or service that we received for free or other considerations, we will note it.

Powered by Rollyo
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 01/2005
HitTail.com

« Lawyers and CPAs Blogging | Main | Media Fragmentation and the Growth of Small Publishers »

April 07, 2008

Working for Equity Instead of Cash

Inc. has an article on service firms waiving their fees and instead taking equity in their clients.  As the article points out, this approach was common during the 90's Interent boom.  Interest in this waned when the Internet bust resulted in most tech start-up equity becoming worthless, but it seems to be coming back.

Part of my business is working with tech start-ups as an advisor/consultant. I often take stock in lieu of cash.  I've been doing this for almost 10 years and overall this approach has worked out positively for me.  However, I've learned four lessons the hard way:

1.  Most tech start-ups fail.  I have a file drawer full of worthless stock certificates and I continue to add to it.  Even the best venture capital firms have a lot of failures and few successes.  Before you agree to take equity in lieu of cash, you need to understand that any individual early stage start-up company equity is most likely going to be worthless. 

2.  Not all start-up stock is created equally.  I won't bother going into details on start-up financing terms (see this post for an overview of typical VC terms) except to say if you don't know and understand:

  • the firm's cap table and valuation
  • what kind of stock you are getting
  • where your stock sits in the liquidity preference stack
  • what rights and preferences the founders and the other investors have
  • what your rights are

there is a real good chance your stock is not going to be worth much.

3.  Luck plays a role in high tech start-up success.  I've had the good fortune to both work for and invest in successful tech start-ups.  I've also invested in a number of start-up failures. 

The best start-up I ever invested in went bankrupt in 2001.  They had a great managment team, A list VCs, great technology, excellent sales traction and market leadership in a very exciting space.  They looked like a sure winner.  But for a mix of reasons mostly beyond the control of the company, they went under.

At the same time I had equity in a company that was in horrible shape with no hope of survival.  For reasons I still don't understand, more or less out of the blue a large corporation acquired them for a substanial amount of money.  The company and its investors were very lucky, and all had a very merry Christmas.

The bottom line is luck - good and bad - plays a role in tech start-up success and failure.  Also, no matter how good a start-up looks there are many reasons it can fail.   

4.  I am very picky about the companies I am willing to take equity from.  Before taking equity in a company I go through a VC-like investment and due diligence process.  I've found this greatly increases the chances I see a positive return. 

While I've made at least my share of mistakes taking equity in lieu of pay, I continue to see this as a key part of my business model.  Simply put, it provides me with substantial financial upside with limited risk.  Also, because I have equity in multiple tech start-ups I gain portfolio diversification benefits (meaning I'm more likely to get lucky).   

As long as you fully understand the risks and can easily absorb the inevitable losses, trading cash for equity can be a very good idea.  Just make sure you can absorb the losses. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345675df69e200e551aa52848833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Working for Equity Instead of Cash:

Comments

Have not met anyone I wanted to hire who was willing to work for equity. Yet. Cash is king and it's a developer's market out there right now...

Good point. My post looks at this from the consultant/employee point of view. Employers have to fully think this through also. In particular, it can get messy having a lot of little shareholders.

Steve

Excellant post.
I agree with your comment when you said:

"Simply put, it provides me with substantial financial upside with limited risk."

On a smaller scale model here is an idea for those of us who are intrigued by this model but are afraid of working with start ups.

What about working with smaller business that are established already but have little or no marketing plan & taking a percentage of profits on sales generated thru your efforts?

I have done this for no fees up front and get paid in equity on all resulting business. I like this partnership model as it creates a win- win relationship for all.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Ad Box

Analytics